Amtrak · Sacramento, CA – Bakersfield, CA
Gold Runner Cell Service & Coverage Map
Modeled coverage on board the Gold Runner, Sacramento, CA to Bakersfield, CA. On the train, Verizon has the most solid coverage at 96% of the route, ahead of AT&T (95%) and T-Mobile (83%). Amber stretches are spotty: signal often works but may drop. Verizon's longest true dead zone runs about 0 miles near Sacramento, CA.
The whole line at a glance
Bakersfield, CA on the left, Sacramento, CA on the right. Scroll sideways on a phone. Hover a band for its mileposts. Verizon, on the train.
Carriers compared on the train
| Carrier | Coverage mix | Solid | Spotty | 5G | Dead-zone miles | Longest gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verizon Best on board | 96% | 4% | 51% | 0 | 0.0 mi | |
| AT&T | 95% | 5% | 85% | 0 | 0.0 mi | |
| T-Mobile | 83% | 17% | 75% | 0 | 0.0 mi |
Coverage summary
Verizon · On the train (in-vehicle model)
of the route has solid Verizon service on the train, plus 4% spotty
has modeled 5G; 35% at the faster 35/3 Mbps tier
longest dead zone (no signal in either model), near Sacramento, CA
longest unbroken covered stretch, between Antioch and Lodi
- 5G NR · 35/3 Mbps 34.9%
- 5G NR · 7/1 Mbps 15.9%
- 4G LTE 45.0%
- Spotty (outdoor-strength only) 4.1%
- Not yet processed 0.1%
Verizon · Outdoor model
of the route has solid Verizon service outdoors
has modeled 5G; 89% at the faster 35/3 Mbps tier
longest dead zone (no signal in either model), near Sacramento, CA
longest unbroken covered stretch, between Merced and Madera
- 5G NR · 35/3 Mbps 88.7%
- 5G NR · 7/1 Mbps 6.6%
- 4G LTE 4.6%
- Not yet processed 0.1%
AT&T · On the train (in-vehicle model)
of the route has solid AT&T service on the train, plus 5% spotty
has modeled 5G; 63% at the faster 35/3 Mbps tier
longest dead zone (no signal in either model), near Sacramento, CA
longest unbroken covered stretch, between Fresno and Hanford
- 5G NR · 35/3 Mbps 63.4%
- 5G NR · 7/1 Mbps 21.0%
- 4G LTE 10.4%
- Spotty (outdoor-strength only) 5.1%
- Not yet processed 0.1%
AT&T · Outdoor model
of the route has solid AT&T service outdoors
has modeled 5G; 77% at the faster 35/3 Mbps tier
longest dead zone (no signal in either model), near Sacramento, CA
longest unbroken covered stretch, between Merced and Madera
- 5G NR · 35/3 Mbps 77.2%
- 5G NR · 7/1 Mbps 22.5%
- 4G LTE 0.2%
- Not yet processed 0.1%
T-Mobile · On the train (in-vehicle model)
of the route has solid T-Mobile service on the train, plus 17% spotty
has modeled 5G; 52% at the faster 35/3 Mbps tier
longest dead zone (no signal in either model), near Sacramento, CA
longest unbroken covered stretch, near Lodi, CA
- 5G NR · 35/3 Mbps 51.7%
- 5G NR · 7/1 Mbps 23.4%
- 4G LTE 7.9%
- Spotty (outdoor-strength only) 16.9%
- Not yet processed 0.1%
T-Mobile · Outdoor model
of the route has solid T-Mobile service outdoors
has modeled 5G; 97% at the faster 35/3 Mbps tier
longest dead zone (no signal in either model), near Sacramento, CA
longest unbroken covered stretch, between Merced and Madera
- 5G NR · 35/3 Mbps 97.2%
- 5G NR · 7/1 Mbps 2.6%
- 4G LTE 0.1%
- Not yet processed 0.1%
Station to station
In timetable order from Sacramento, CA. Distances are along the track. Follows the carrier and model selected on the map.
| Segment | Miles | Coverage mix | Solid | 5G | Longest gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sacramento → Richmond | 118 | 99% | 55% | — | |
| Richmond → Martinez | 19 | 100% | 45% | — | |
| Martinez → Berkeley | 25 | 99% | 51% | — | |
| Berkeley → Emeryville | 2 | 100% | 52% | — | |
| Emeryville → Oakland | 5 | 100% | 62% | — | |
| Oakland → Antioch | 50 | 100% | 50% | — | |
| Antioch → Lodi | 44 | 100% | 65% | — | |
| Lodi → Stockton | 12 | 100% | 71% | — | |
| Stockton → Stockton | 1 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Stockton → Modesto | 30 | 96% | 45% | — | |
| Modesto → Denair | 12 | 100% | 73% | — | |
| Denair → Atwater | 17 | 70% | 45% | — | |
| Atwater → Merced | 7 | 100% | 61% | — | |
| Merced → Madera | 32 | 100% | 25% | — | |
| Madera → Fresno | 26 | 97% | 54% | — | |
| Fresno → Hanford | 30 | 99% | 47% | — | |
| Hanford → Corcoran | 17 | 97% | 59% | — | |
| Corcoran → Allensworth | 19 | 78% | 5% | — | |
| Allensworth → Wasco | 19 | 59% | 21% | — | |
| Wasco → Bakersfield | 26 | 100% | 78% | — |
| Segment | Miles | Coverage mix | Solid | 5G | Longest gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sacramento → Richmond | 118 | 100% | 99% | — | |
| Richmond → Martinez | 19 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Martinez → Berkeley | 25 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Berkeley → Emeryville | 2 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Emeryville → Oakland | 5 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Oakland → Antioch | 50 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Antioch → Lodi | 44 | 100% | 99% | — | |
| Lodi → Stockton | 12 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Stockton → Stockton | 1 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Stockton → Modesto | 30 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Modesto → Denair | 12 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Denair → Atwater | 17 | 100% | 89% | — | |
| Atwater → Merced | 7 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Merced → Madera | 32 | 100% | 68% | — | |
| Madera → Fresno | 26 | 100% | 99% | — | |
| Fresno → Hanford | 30 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Hanford → Corcoran | 17 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Corcoran → Allensworth | 19 | 100% | 53% | — | |
| Allensworth → Wasco | 19 | 100% | 97% | — | |
| Wasco → Bakersfield | 26 | 100% | 100% | — |
| Segment | Miles | Coverage mix | Solid | 5G | Longest gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sacramento → Richmond | 118 | 94% | 83% | — | |
| Richmond → Martinez | 19 | 84% | 75% | — | |
| Martinez → Berkeley | 25 | 88% | 82% | — | |
| Berkeley → Emeryville | 2 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Emeryville → Oakland | 5 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Oakland → Antioch | 50 | 88% | 81% | — | |
| Antioch → Lodi | 44 | 97% | 79% | — | |
| Lodi → Stockton | 12 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Stockton → Stockton | 1 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Stockton → Modesto | 30 | 97% | 91% | — | |
| Modesto → Denair | 12 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Denair → Atwater | 17 | 100% | 83% | — | |
| Atwater → Merced | 7 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Merced → Madera | 32 | 87% | 71% | — | |
| Madera → Fresno | 26 | 100% | 95% | — | |
| Fresno → Hanford | 30 | 100% | 99% | — | |
| Hanford → Corcoran | 17 | 100% | 85% | — | |
| Corcoran → Allensworth | 19 | 95% | 71% | — | |
| Allensworth → Wasco | 19 | 100% | 72% | — | |
| Wasco → Bakersfield | 26 | 100% | 97% | — |
| Segment | Miles | Coverage mix | Solid | 5G | Longest gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sacramento → Richmond | 118 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Richmond → Martinez | 19 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Martinez → Berkeley | 25 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Berkeley → Emeryville | 2 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Emeryville → Oakland | 5 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Oakland → Antioch | 50 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Antioch → Lodi | 44 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Lodi → Stockton | 12 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Stockton → Stockton | 1 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Stockton → Modesto | 30 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Modesto → Denair | 12 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Denair → Atwater | 17 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Atwater → Merced | 7 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Merced → Madera | 32 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Madera → Fresno | 26 | 100% | 98% | — | |
| Fresno → Hanford | 30 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Hanford → Corcoran | 17 | 100% | 99% | — | |
| Corcoran → Allensworth | 19 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Allensworth → Wasco | 19 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Wasco → Bakersfield | 26 | 100% | 100% | — |
| Segment | Miles | Coverage mix | Solid | 5G | Longest gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sacramento → Richmond | 118 | 84% | 78% | — | |
| Richmond → Martinez | 19 | 72% | 57% | — | |
| Martinez → Berkeley | 25 | 77% | 61% | — | |
| Berkeley → Emeryville | 2 | 81% | 81% | — | |
| Emeryville → Oakland | 5 | 100% | 97% | — | |
| Oakland → Antioch | 50 | 72% | 59% | — | |
| Antioch → Lodi | 44 | 92% | 83% | — | |
| Lodi → Stockton | 12 | 100% | 96% | — | |
| Stockton → Stockton | 1 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Stockton → Modesto | 30 | 77% | 71% | — | |
| Modesto → Denair | 12 | 96% | 86% | — | |
| Denair → Atwater | 17 | 97% | 87% | — | |
| Atwater → Merced | 7 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Merced → Madera | 32 | 74% | 66% | — | |
| Madera → Fresno | 26 | 95% | 85% | — | |
| Fresno → Hanford | 30 | 84% | 79% | — | |
| Hanford → Corcoran | 17 | 96% | 92% | — | |
| Corcoran → Allensworth | 19 | 52% | 43% | — | |
| Allensworth → Wasco | 19 | 66% | 58% | — | |
| Wasco → Bakersfield | 26 | 100% | 100% | — |
| Segment | Miles | Coverage mix | Solid | 5G | Longest gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sacramento → Richmond | 118 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Richmond → Martinez | 19 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Martinez → Berkeley | 25 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Berkeley → Emeryville | 2 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Emeryville → Oakland | 5 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Oakland → Antioch | 50 | 100% | 99% | — | |
| Antioch → Lodi | 44 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Lodi → Stockton | 12 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Stockton → Stockton | 1 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Stockton → Modesto | 30 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Modesto → Denair | 12 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Denair → Atwater | 17 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Atwater → Merced | 7 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Merced → Madera | 32 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Madera → Fresno | 26 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Fresno → Hanford | 30 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Hanford → Corcoran | 17 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Corcoran → Allensworth | 19 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Allensworth → Wasco | 19 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Wasco → Bakersfield | 26 | 100% | 100% | — |
Gold Runner cell service FAQ
Does the Gold Runner have cell service?
For most of the trip, yes. Inside the train, solid coverage (the FCC's in-vehicle model) reaches 96% for Verizon, 95% for AT&T, 83% for T-Mobile of the 512-mile route from Sacramento, CA to Bakersfield, CA. Much of the rest is spotty rather than dead: Verizon has some signal on 100%, AT&T has some signal on 100%, T-Mobile has some signal on 100%.
Which carrier is best on the Gold Runner?
Verizon has the most modeled on-train coverage (96%), with 5G on 51% of the route. AT&T covers 95% and T-Mobile covers 83%.
Where is the longest dead zone on the Gold Runner?
Verizon: about 0 miles near Sacramento, CA. AT&T: about 0 miles near Sacramento, CA. T-Mobile: about 0 miles near Sacramento, CA.
Does Amtrak Wi-Fi work on the Gold Runner?
Amtrak Wi-Fi relies on cellular networks, so it generally weakens or drops in the same places your phone does. Expect it to be unreliable through the dead zones shown on this map.
How accurate is this coverage map?
It reflects carrier-reported modeled coverage published by the FCC (data as of Dec 31, 2025). It is not an onboard measurement. BarTrakr shows the FCC's in-vehicle model by default; the outdoor model is available with the Outdoor switch.
Can I use BarTrakr on the train without signal?
Yes. Tap “Save for offline” before you board. The route, coverage data and map background up to zoom 10 are stored on your device, and live tracking uses your phone's GPS, which works without cell service.
About this data
- Coverage: FCC Broadband Data Collection mobile coverage for Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, release D25 (as of Dec 31, 2025, published Oct 13, 2026).
- Route: U.S. DOT / BTS National Transportation Atlas Database, Amtrak Routes. Stations and stop order: Amtrak GTFS.
- On the train: colored where the FCC in-vehicle model shows coverage; amber (spotty) where only the outdoor model does; red where neither does.
- Stretches shorter than a quarter mile are merged into their neighbors; at train speed they last only seconds.