Amtrak · New York, NY – Toronto, ON
Maple Leaf Cell Service & Coverage Map
Modeled coverage on board the Maple Leaf, New York, NY to Toronto, ON. On the train, AT&T has the most solid coverage at 86% of the route, ahead of Verizon (82%) and T-Mobile (53%). Amber stretches are spotty: signal often works but may drop. AT&T's longest true dead zone runs about 1 miles near Hudson, NY.
The whole line at a glance
Toronto, ON on the left, New York, NY on the right. Scroll sideways on a phone. Hover a band for its mileposts. Verizon, on the train.
Carriers compared on the train
| Carrier | Coverage mix | Solid | Spotty | 5G | Dead-zone miles | Longest gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT&T Best on board | 86% | 13% | 71% | 2 | 1.0 mi | |
| Verizon | 82% | 18% | 31% | 0 | 0.0 mi | |
| T-Mobile | 53% | 44% | 49% | 15 | 1.8 mi |
Coverage summary
Verizon · On the train (in-vehicle model)
of the route has solid Verizon service on the train, plus 18% spotty
has modeled 5G; 19% at the faster 35/3 Mbps tier
longest dead zone (no signal in either model), near New York, NY
longest unbroken covered stretch, near Buffalo, NY
- 5G NR · 35/3 Mbps 18.9%
- 5G NR · 7/1 Mbps 7.4%
- 4G LTE 43.4%
- Spotty (outdoor-strength only) 15.2%
- Not yet processed 15.1%
Verizon · Outdoor model
of the route has solid Verizon service outdoors
has modeled 5G; 57% at the faster 35/3 Mbps tier
longest dead zone (no signal in either model), near New York, NY
longest unbroken covered stretch, between Amsterdam and Utica
- 5G NR · 35/3 Mbps 57.5%
- 5G NR · 7/1 Mbps 9.4%
- 4G LTE 18.0%
- Not yet processed 15.1%
AT&T · On the train (in-vehicle model)
of the route has solid AT&T service on the train, plus 13% spotty
has modeled 5G; 45% at the faster 35/3 Mbps tier
longest dead zone (no signal in either model), near Hudson, NY
longest unbroken covered stretch, between Croton-on-Hudson and Poughkeepsie
- 5G NR · 35/3 Mbps 45.2%
- 5G NR · 7/1 Mbps 14.8%
- 4G LTE 13.2%
- Spotty (outdoor-strength only) 11.3%
- No modeled coverage 0.4%
- Not yet processed 15.1%
Plan downloads and calls around Hudson–Rensselaer (1.7 mi without coverage).
AT&T · Outdoor model
of the route has solid AT&T service outdoors
has modeled 5G; 59% at the faster 35/3 Mbps tier
longest dead zone (no signal in either model), near Hudson, NY
longest unbroken covered stretch, near Syracuse, NY
- 5G NR · 35/3 Mbps 59.2%
- 5G NR · 7/1 Mbps 18.1%
- 4G LTE 7.4%
- No modeled coverage 0.3%
- Not yet processed 15.1%
Plan downloads and calls around Hudson–Rensselaer (1.6 mi without coverage).
T-Mobile · On the train (in-vehicle model)
of the route has solid T-Mobile service on the train, plus 44% spotty
has modeled 5G; 29% at the faster 35/3 Mbps tier
longest dead zone (no signal in either model), between Rochester and Depew
longest unbroken covered stretch, between Buffalo and Niagara Falls
- 5G NR · 35/3 Mbps 28.8%
- 5G NR · 7/1 Mbps 12.8%
- 4G LTE 3.5%
- Spotty (outdoor-strength only) 37.1%
- No modeled coverage 2.8%
- Not yet processed 15.1%
Plan downloads and calls around Amsterdam–Utica (6.6 mi without coverage), Rochester–Depew (2.4 mi without coverage), Syracuse–Rochester (2.2 mi without coverage).
T-Mobile · Outdoor model
of the route has solid T-Mobile service outdoors
has modeled 5G; 64% at the faster 35/3 Mbps tier
longest dead zone (no signal in either model), between Rochester and Depew
longest unbroken covered stretch, between Rome and Syracuse
- 5G NR · 35/3 Mbps 64.1%
- 5G NR · 7/1 Mbps 14.9%
- 4G LTE 2.4%
- No modeled coverage 3.6%
- Not yet processed 15.1%
Plan downloads and calls around Amsterdam–Utica (7.4 mi without coverage), Syracuse–Rochester (3.8 mi without coverage), Hudson–Rensselaer (2.7 mi without coverage).
Station to station
In timetable order from New York, NY. Distances are along the track. Follows the carrier and model selected on the map.
| Segment | Miles | Coverage mix | Solid | 5G | Longest gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York → Yonkers | 14 | 100% | 62% | — | |
| Yonkers → Croton-on-Hudson | 18 | 96% | 20% | — | |
| Croton-on-Hudson → Poughkeepsie | 40 | 99% | 8% | — | |
| Poughkeepsie → Rhinecliff | 16 | 85% | 38% | — | |
| Rhinecliff → Hudson | 25 | 78% | 18% | — | |
| Hudson → Rensselaer | 28 | 38% | 6% | — | |
| Rensselaer → Schenectady | 18 | 85% | 50% | — | |
| Schenectady → Amsterdam | 18 | 58% | 15% | — | |
| Amsterdam → Utica | 60 | 86% | 27% | — | |
| Utica → Rome | 14 | 89% | 36% | — | |
| Rome → Syracuse | 40 | 83% | 27% | — | |
| Syracuse → Rochester | 80 | 76% | 26% | — | |
| Rochester → Depew | 61 | 82% | 39% | — | |
| Depew → Buffalo | 8 | 100% | 96% | — | |
| Buffalo → Niagara Falls | 25 | 100% | 78% | — | |
| Niagara Falls → Niagara Falls | 0 | 100% | 0% | — | |
| Niagara Falls → Toronto | 82 | 0% | 0% | — |
| Segment | Miles | Coverage mix | Solid | 5G | Longest gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York → Yonkers | 14 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Yonkers → Croton-on-Hudson | 18 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Croton-on-Hudson → Poughkeepsie | 40 | 100% | 83% | — | |
| Poughkeepsie → Rhinecliff | 16 | 100% | 75% | — | |
| Rhinecliff → Hudson | 25 | 100% | 84% | — | |
| Hudson → Rensselaer | 28 | 100% | 41% | — | |
| Rensselaer → Schenectady | 18 | 100% | 84% | — | |
| Schenectady → Amsterdam | 18 | 100% | 64% | — | |
| Amsterdam → Utica | 60 | 100% | 74% | — | |
| Utica → Rome | 14 | 100% | 87% | — | |
| Rome → Syracuse | 40 | 100% | 72% | — | |
| Syracuse → Rochester | 80 | 100% | 78% | — | |
| Rochester → Depew | 61 | 100% | 80% | — | |
| Depew → Buffalo | 8 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Buffalo → Niagara Falls | 25 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Niagara Falls → Niagara Falls | 0 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Niagara Falls → Toronto | 82 | 0% | 0% | — |
| Segment | Miles | Coverage mix | Solid | 5G | Longest gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York → Yonkers | 14 | 98% | 92% | 0.3 mi | |
| Yonkers → Croton-on-Hudson | 18 | 100% | 53% | — | |
| Croton-on-Hudson → Poughkeepsie | 40 | 100% | 96% | — | |
| Poughkeepsie → Rhinecliff | 16 | 90% | 86% | — | |
| Rhinecliff → Hudson | 25 | 94% | 71% | — | |
| Hudson → Rensselaer | 28 | 60% | 52% | 1.0 mi | |
| Rensselaer → Schenectady | 18 | 96% | 93% | — | |
| Schenectady → Amsterdam | 18 | 76% | 61% | — | |
| Amsterdam → Utica | 60 | 86% | 71% | — | |
| Utica → Rome | 14 | 100% | 91% | — | |
| Rome → Syracuse | 40 | 77% | 59% | — | |
| Syracuse → Rochester | 80 | 76% | 50% | — | |
| Rochester → Depew | 61 | 88% | 72% | — | |
| Depew → Buffalo | 8 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Buffalo → Niagara Falls | 25 | 100% | 91% | — | |
| Niagara Falls → Niagara Falls | 0 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Niagara Falls → Toronto | 82 | 0% | 0% | — |
| Segment | Miles | Coverage mix | Solid | 5G | Longest gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York → Yonkers | 14 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Yonkers → Croton-on-Hudson | 18 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Croton-on-Hudson → Poughkeepsie | 40 | 100% | 99% | — | |
| Poughkeepsie → Rhinecliff | 16 | 100% | 89% | — | |
| Rhinecliff → Hudson | 25 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Hudson → Rensselaer | 28 | 94% | 83% | 0.8 mi | |
| Rensselaer → Schenectady | 18 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Schenectady → Amsterdam | 18 | 100% | 95% | — | |
| Amsterdam → Utica | 60 | 100% | 96% | — | |
| Utica → Rome | 14 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Rome → Syracuse | 40 | 100% | 96% | — | |
| Syracuse → Rochester | 80 | 100% | 72% | — | |
| Rochester → Depew | 61 | 100% | 86% | — | |
| Depew → Buffalo | 8 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Buffalo → Niagara Falls | 25 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Niagara Falls → Niagara Falls | 0 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Niagara Falls → Toronto | 82 | 0% | 0% | — |
| Segment | Miles | Coverage mix | Solid | 5G | Longest gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York → Yonkers | 14 | 96% | 90% | — | |
| Yonkers → Croton-on-Hudson | 18 | 60% | 49% | — | |
| Croton-on-Hudson → Poughkeepsie | 40 | 36% | 26% | 0.4 mi | |
| Poughkeepsie → Rhinecliff | 16 | 19% | 17% | — | |
| Rhinecliff → Hudson | 25 | 53% | 33% | — | |
| Hudson → Rensselaer | 28 | 39% | 37% | 1.0 mi | |
| Rensselaer → Schenectady | 18 | 74% | 74% | — | |
| Schenectady → Amsterdam | 18 | 38% | 35% | 0.8 mi | |
| Amsterdam → Utica | 60 | 39% | 36% | 1.4 mi | |
| Utica → Rome | 14 | 62% | 55% | — | |
| Rome → Syracuse | 40 | 45% | 41% | — | |
| Syracuse → Rochester | 80 | 49% | 48% | 0.9 mi | |
| Rochester → Depew | 61 | 63% | 61% | 1.8 mi | |
| Depew → Buffalo | 8 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Buffalo → Niagara Falls | 25 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Niagara Falls → Niagara Falls | 0 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Niagara Falls → Toronto | 82 | 0% | 0% | — |
| Segment | Miles | Coverage mix | Solid | 5G | Longest gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York → Yonkers | 14 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Yonkers → Croton-on-Hudson | 18 | 100% | 96% | — | |
| Croton-on-Hudson → Poughkeepsie | 40 | 95% | 92% | 0.7 mi | |
| Poughkeepsie → Rhinecliff | 16 | 100% | 83% | — | |
| Rhinecliff → Hudson | 25 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Hudson → Rensselaer | 28 | 90% | 86% | 1.1 mi | |
| Rensselaer → Schenectady | 18 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Schenectady → Amsterdam | 18 | 93% | 89% | 0.8 mi | |
| Amsterdam → Utica | 60 | 88% | 81% | 1.9 mi | |
| Utica → Rome | 14 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Rome → Syracuse | 40 | 100% | 99% | — | |
| Syracuse → Rochester | 80 | 95% | 94% | 1.6 mi | |
| Rochester → Depew | 61 | 96% | 93% | 2.7 mi | |
| Depew → Buffalo | 8 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Buffalo → Niagara Falls | 25 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Niagara Falls → Niagara Falls | 0 | 100% | 100% | — | |
| Niagara Falls → Toronto | 82 | 0% | 0% | — |
Maple Leaf cell service FAQ
Does the Maple Leaf have cell service?
For most of the trip, yes. Inside the train, solid coverage (the FCC's in-vehicle model) reaches 86% for AT&T, 82% for Verizon, 53% for T-Mobile of the 546-mile route from New York, NY to Toronto, ON. Much of the rest is spotty rather than dead: AT&T has some signal on 100%, Verizon has some signal on 100%, T-Mobile has some signal on 97%.
Which carrier is best on the Maple Leaf?
AT&T has the most modeled on-train coverage (86%), with 5G on 71% of the route. Verizon covers 82% and T-Mobile covers 53%.
Where is the longest dead zone on the Maple Leaf?
AT&T: about 1 miles near Hudson, NY. Verizon: about 0 miles near New York, NY. T-Mobile: about 2 miles between Rochester and Depew.
Does Amtrak Wi-Fi work on the Maple Leaf?
Amtrak Wi-Fi relies on cellular networks, so it generally weakens or drops in the same places your phone does. Expect it to be unreliable through the dead zones shown on this map.
How accurate is this coverage map?
It reflects carrier-reported modeled coverage published by the FCC (data as of Dec 31, 2025). It is not an onboard measurement. BarTrakr shows the FCC's in-vehicle model by default; the outdoor model is available with the Outdoor switch.
Can I use BarTrakr on the train without signal?
Yes. Tap “Save for offline” before you board. The route, coverage data and map background up to zoom 10 are stored on your device, and live tracking uses your phone's GPS, which works without cell service.
About this data
- Coverage: FCC Broadband Data Collection mobile coverage for Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, release D25 (as of Dec 31, 2025, published Oct 13, 2026).
- Route: U.S. DOT / BTS National Transportation Atlas Database, Amtrak Routes. Stations and stop order: Amtrak GTFS.
- About 82 miles in Canada are shown in gray: FCC data covers the United States only.
- On the train: colored where the FCC in-vehicle model shows coverage; amber (spotty) where only the outdoor model does; red where neither does.
- Stretches shorter than a quarter mile are merged into their neighbors; at train speed they last only seconds.